This seems to be in the court documents submitted by MCFD, court date set for October 19th. I have already written about the gradual return of children to biological parents, we already know this to be nothing more then a stall tactic. More money, more time ,more court dates.
I would like to address the fact that a financial statement is not submitted to the parent or court outlining the many costs attributed to the removal of Ayn. The hospitalization of Ayn, the medicating of this small girl. The meetings and professionals brought in to do nothing more but prove a point.
I would also like to see a quoted financial statement outlining what it would cost the tax payers to have kept this little girl at home while bringing in the help or respite needed!
I can not see how this is in anyone`s best interest financially, emotionally or long term. I can not find any proof dictating that this is ever a successful route to take.
Yet as I continue my research I am finding more and more families with disabled or challenged children turning to CAS or running from them. Most turning to them find out very quickly how corrupt this system is.
Turn your child over to the system and the resources needed will be put into place in a strangers home. Can`t afford what`s needed?? No problem, we`ll fund a foster home instead of you. Dental care needed?? Medical care needed?? No problem, your child will receive what`s needed in a group home or foster home after being abused and unloved.
You the parent do not get resources or help. You do not get to keep your child in a loving environment. If you want help then we the society must make money from the care of your child.
Would CAS loose Government funding if they implemented resources into a natural home?? Absolutely. This shows a decrease in CAS need and involvement.
Where exactly does the problem lay then??
No comments:
Post a Comment